|
1
|
- Daniel R. Roman, John M. Brozena, and Yan M. Wang
|
|
2
|
- PRIMARY:
- To obtain and process gravity data that enhance the solution of a
gravimetric geoid
- SECONDARY:
- Estimate the absolute error of U.S. vertical datum, NAVD 88
- Estimate local SST conditions in the Bay of Maine
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- 20 km along track filter
- Crossover analysis for internal accuracy
- Upward continue gravity anomalies
- Comparison of observations & gravity anomalies at 7.6 km to
establish external accuracy
- Remove EGM reference field at elevation
- Downward continue to surface and restore reference field
- Compare to gravity anomalies at the surface
|
|
7
|
- For regional gravimetric geoid models, adequate gravity data coverage is
needed
- Augmentation of terrestrial, shipborne and altimeter-implied data by
airborne profiles
- Internal and external analysis for accuracy
- Downward continue to geoid using R-C-R
- Compare to surface gravity
anomalies to determine if the data are seamless from onshore to deep sea
|
|
8
|
- Downward-continued aerogravity will improve near-shore geoid model
- Changes in the resulting gravimetic geoid can be verified at GPSBM
locations
- Comparison with other gravity missions will highlight impact of
elevation/speed
- Combining the littoral geoid with lidar-derived SST will yield estimates
of the absolute accuracy of NAVD 88
|
|
9
|
|