Single Frequency Broadcast Ionosphere correction May 3, 2000 |
Single Frequency Troposphere correction May 3, 2000 |
Single Frequency Rapid orbit and clock May 3, 2000 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The images above demonstrate the effect
of various corrections on the accuracy of GPS data now that selective availability
(SA) is gone. Each plot shows the error in ellipsoidal height of 24 hours
of data (0000 to 2359 UTC) taken on May 03, 2000, by the Continuously Operating
Reference Stations (CORS) at Erlanger, Kentucky.
The image on the left displays height scatter after applying the GPS
broadcast ionosphere model corrections (ICD-GPS-200C) to the L1 pseudoranges.
The image in the center displays height scatter after applying an additional
correction for seasonal troposphere delay to the L1 pseudoranges. The image
on the right displays height scatter when IGS rapid orbits and clocks are
substituted for the broadcast orbit and clock data.
The table at left summarizes the accuracies when progressively including the different corrections described above. Click on any of the results for a full-size image of the underlying 24-hour data set. The numbers in the table represent the +/- limit in meters bounding 95% of the computed heights. These results indicate the accuracy that is obtainable from single frequency L1 pseudorange data. In particular, the second column reflects the accuracy currently obtainable without “outside” data, such as precise GPS clocks or surface barometric pressure. Note that profound improvements in height accuracy are possible with application of a general troposphere model. The third column shows the improvement if precise orbit and clock data could be used in place of the broadcast information, or if broadcast orbits and clocks could be upgraded. The third column indicates the possibilities if precise GPS orbit and clock data are quickly gathered in a global network, computed and predicted over short time intervals, and made available through the Internet. The data, and figures, show considerable variation, and, as a general rule, do not perform as well as the dual frequency results. Note that there are occasions where the single frequency data, supplemented by the broadcast ionosphere model, show less 95% scatter than the comparable dual frequency data. Dual frequency data represent a measurement of the ionosphere, and are subject to the multipath error on both the L1 and on the L2 pseudoranges. Even so, the most robust results are obtained through the dual frequency ionosphere correction. For additional information: Dr. Richard Snay
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fine Print: Data taken at the Erlanger National CORS station, National Geodetic Survey, at 30 second intervals. Instrumentation was an Ashtech Z-12 receiver. GPS data were single-frequency (just L1) pseudorange. Data were processed in accordance with the GPS Interface Control Document ICD-GPS-200C, using the broadcast orbit parameters in the World Geodetic System WGS 84 (G873) reference system (except where specified), and using the broadcast ionospheric model. The troposphere model was a simple seasonal/global model developed by Tom Herring, MIT, feeding Saastamoinen's model for zenith delay, and Herring’s dry and wet mapping functions. No actual meteorological measurements were used in the processing. The precise GPS orbit and clock data demonstrated were the IGS rapid orbit product. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||