Dual Frequency Measured Ionosphere correction May 3, 2000 |
Dual Frequency Troposphere correction May 3, 2000 |
Dual Frequency Rapid orbit and clock May 3, 2000 |
| The images above demonstrate the effect
of various corrections on the accuracy of GPS data now that selective availability
(SA) is gone. Each plot shows the error in ellipsoidal height of 24 hours
of data (0000 to 2359 UTC) taken on May 03, 2000, by the Continuously Operating
Reference Stations (CORS) at Erlanger, Kentucky.
The image on the left displays height scatter after correcting for ionosphere
derived from L1 and L2 pseudoranges. The image in the center displays height
scatter after applying an additional correction for seasonal troposphere
delay. The image on the right displays height scatter when IGS rapid orbits
and clocks are substituted for the broadcast orbit and clock data.
The table at left summarizes the accuracies when progressively including the different corrections described above. Click on any of the results for a full-size image of the underlying 24-hour data set. The numbers in the table represent the +/- limit in meters bounding 95% of the computed heights. Now that SA has been removed, it is possible to assess the improvement that is possible, and measure the contributions to the overall error seen in a GPS height. The table shows that profound improvement to height accuracy can be obtained if a general model of troposphere error, not based on actual surface measurements, is applied to the data. The third column shows the improvement if precise orbit and clock data could be used in place of the broadcast information, or if broadcast orbits and clocks could be upgraded. The third column indicates the possibilities if precise GPS orbit and clock data are quickly gathered in a global network, computed and predicted over short time intervals, and made available through the Internet. The third column also gives an indication of the level of L1 and L2 pseudorange multipath present at ERLA, and provides a bound on residual troposphere error. The time series of May 5 and May 19 show disturbances that are not present in the single frequency, L1-only, data. These disturbances are most evident after the troposphere correction is applied. It is unlikely that a local influence, such as an object, could create a multipath reflection on L2 but not on L1. Some form of radio frequency interference or receiver malfunction may be the cause. For additional information: Dr. Richard Snay
|
||
| Fine Print: Data taken at the Erlanger National CORS station, National Geodetic Survey, at 30 second intervals. Instrumentation was an Ashtech Z-12 receiver. GPS data were dual-frequency pseudorange (both L1 and L2). Data were processed in accordance with the GPS Interface Control Document ICD-GPS-200C, using the broadcast orbit parameters in the World Geodetic System WGS 84 (G873) reference system, except where specified. The troposphere model was a simple seasonal/global model developed by Tom Herring, MIT, feeding Saastamoinen's model for zenith delay, and Herring’s dry and wet mapping functions. No actual meteorological measurements were used in the processing. The precise GPS orbit and clock data demonstrated were the IGS rapid orbit product. | ||