|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Recreational
- Navigational
- Resource Mapping
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- RTN establish 1000’s of new CORS…
- Additions to the national CORS
- Better modeling
- Other augmentation systems benefit from modeling
- More data for scientific community
- Vendors sell more rovers!
- Yeeha!
|
|
19
|
- Support Real-Time GPS Initiatives
Across the Nation
- Support Public Safety and
Commerce
- Resources for Public and
Commercial Networks
- Address Duplicity of Effort
- Vendor Solution Independent
- Support Current National
Positioning Programs
|
|
20
|
- American Congress Surveying &
Mapping - ACSM
- National Society of Professional
Surveyors - NSPS
- Real-Time Network (RTN)
Administrators
- Local and State Industry
Associations
- 2006 NGS CORS Forum @ CGSIC
- International NTRIP Symposium
(BKG)
- Trade/User Conferences
- Individuals have contacted their
representatives
|
|
21
|
- Geodesy - Reference Framework
- Little Local or Regional Expertise
- Higher Precision, New Considerations
- Migration from Legacy Reference Systems
|
|
22
|
- Expertise & Education
- Little Local or Regional Expertise
- Few publications
- No risk assessments
- Infrastructure developed without considering RN utility
- Little outreach
- Few applicable guidelines & standards
|
|
23
|
- Communications & IT
- Cellular provider function restrictions
- Local IT concerns
- Risk assessment
- Broader acceptance of NTRIP needed
- Little outreach
- Few applicable guidelines & standards
|
|
24
|
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Few cost-benefit case studies
- Few business model examples
- Difficulty in examining and including other PNT benefits
- Boilerplate cooperative agreements needed
- Big-Ticket public works do not consider RTN utilization
|
|
25
|
- Policy - Bureaucracy
- Misinterpreted as security risk
- Compartmentalized authority/funding
- Does not compete with current programs
- High Precision little discussed
- Locals seek examples/guidance from Fed
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Programs? Bill? Directive? Bake-Sales?
- On-Grid participants have been very effective in articulating their
needs, but as somewhat clueless as how to frame a national program..
|
|
28
|
- Open dialogue with cellular providers concerning restrictions to
implementation of RTN
applications on mobile devices
- IT Security Issue Position Papers
|
|
29
|
- Support NGS role in registration of RTN to Reference Framework…
- Guidelines and Standards
|
|
30
|
- Publications
- Academic Studies
- Security Issue Position Papers
- Application Case Studies
|
|
31
|
- Raw data stream sharing from existing publicly funded reference stations
- Identify public works projects that would benefit from adding to RTN
infrastructure
- Many federal interests would like to participate in RTN at the local
level… can someone give them the OK?
|
|
32
|
- Cost-Benefit Case Studies
- Business Model Examples
- Cooperative Agreement Boilerplates
|
|
33
|
- Outline other PNT Benefits
- Support/Develop Outreach
- Support NDGPS!
- Seek Interface with PNT
|
|
34
|
- The On-Grid initiative will continue as a grass roots effort to develop
a national program, or lend support to programs that seek to provide
resources needed to achieve the same goals
|
|
35
|
- Most potential RTN participants experience some level of hesitance
seeking authorization from above…
- Often the higher authorities are simply waiting for the same from even
higher authorities…
- Sometimes it is as simple as hearing those three magic words:
- This is Cool!
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|